Comments on: Engaging with the community https://jamescousins.com/2011/07/engaging-with-the-community/ A (micro.)blog without a purpose. Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:56:05 +0000 hourly 1 By: Shaftesbury Let’s Talk: a symptom of cultural failure - James Cousins https://jamescousins.com/2011/07/engaging-with-the-community/#comment-29065 Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:56:05 +0000 http://jamescousins.com/?p=4895#comment-29065 […] the topics raised it was fairly typical of any Let’s Talk meeting (I’ve detailed some of them here, here and here): pavements, litter, dog fouling, planning, refuse collection, education, they all […]

]]>
By: Benevolent mob rule in Battersea https://jamescousins.com/2011/07/engaging-with-the-community/#comment-4463 Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:11:29 +0000 http://jamescousins.com/?p=4895#comment-4463 […] turnout was good, that is a relative term. It was good compared to previous meetings, but I think using the maths I applied to our last meeting the attendance was still 0.00% of the ward. When you have small numbers it becomes easy for a small […]

]]>
By: Gail Knight https://jamescousins.com/2011/07/engaging-with-the-community/#comment-2237 Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:11:00 +0000 http://jamescousins.com/?p=4895#comment-2237 I agree with Cyril – Whilst I thought the list of ward topics on the leaflet (that I didn’t get but never mind) was pretty good as ‘agendas’ go, reflecting the discussion topics that people have instigated themselves on Streetlife, the station and the schools are bigger issues, which makes me wonder why we even (barely) have ward meetings as opposed to neighbourhood meetings. 

Several ward boundaries seem to cut through Clapham Junction town centre, thus divvying up issues that are actually relevant to everyone. Basically, no one cares about, knows about, or lives in, wards. Wouldn’t a Clapham Junction, or Battersea, meeting be more relevant? 

And whilst I’m here, the new format seemed to work well for what it was (mass surgery) but I still see a point in open debate. You described public meetings as a dialogue between council and residents, but they’re also (or could be) a dialogue from resident to resident. I’m much more interested in what other residents think than what the council thinks, but think that there’s a role in the council for facilitating it (and attending it, and then ‘listening to us’ and doing something about it)

But you’re both right – if you want people to turn up then you do need some issues or topics that hold significant public interest. ‘The council’ or ‘the ward’ are not it. 

]]>
By: Cyril Richert https://jamescousins.com/2011/07/engaging-with-the-community/#comment-2234 Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:01:00 +0000 http://jamescousins.com/?p=4895#comment-2234 Rain and locations might be issues. More likely also because you should have first an agenda, in order to guide some discussions at the beginning, that should then only lead to an open debate.
Main concerns of the ward population (I immediately think of the station, but also the schools as 2 examples) were not even quoted in the note above…

]]>